NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- (-) Remove Program Design and Management filter Program Design and Management
- (-) Remove Quality Improvement filter Quality Improvement
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (3) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Family and Community Engagement (1) Apply Family and Community Engagement filter
- Professional Development (1) Apply Professional Development filter
- Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access (1) Apply Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access filter
- Supportive Learning Environment (1) Apply Supportive Learning Environment filter
- Systems Building (1) Apply Systems Building filter
Publisher
- (-) Remove Child Trends filter Child Trends
- (-) Remove Harvard Family Research Project filter Harvard Family Research Project
- Afterschool Alliance (1) Apply Afterschool Alliance filter
- BUILD, QRIS National Learning Network (1) Apply BUILD, QRIS National Learning Network filter
- Collaborative for Acadmic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) (1) Apply Collaborative for Acadmic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) filter
- Kids Included Together (KIT) (1) Apply Kids Included Together (KIT) filter
- National Afterschool Association (NAA) (3) Apply National Afterschool Association (NAA) filter
- Office of Child Care (OCC) (6) Apply Office of Child Care (OCC) filter
- Other (14) Apply Other filter
- The Wallace Foundation (1) Apply The Wallace Foundation filter
Search Results
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filter By
This brief explores how programs that use a positive youth development approach can embed a racial equity perspective to effectively meet needs of youth of color. It suggests that programs think about who is offered program services, build staff capacity to recognize personal bias and structural inequalities, and insure leadership opportunities.
This national study explores how low-income children's access to early childhood education might differ from their higher-income peers and how child care subsidy policies can close the gap. The study assigned states to one of five profiles based on a package of subsidy policies to produce findings about which packages provide equity in access to high quality programs.