NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- (-) Remove Family and Community Engagement filter Family and Community Engagement
- (-) Remove Quality Improvement filter Quality Improvement
- (-) Remove Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access filter Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (4) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Professional Development (2) Apply Professional Development filter
- Program Design and Management (1) Apply Program Design and Management filter
- Supportive Learning Environment (2) Apply Supportive Learning Environment filter
- Systems Building (1) Apply Systems Building filter
Publisher
- (-) Remove Child Trends filter Child Trends
- (-) Remove Collaborative for Acadmic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) filter Collaborative for Acadmic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL)
- Afterschool Alliance (3) Apply Afterschool Alliance filter
- Bipartisan Policy Center (1) Apply Bipartisan Policy Center filter
- BUILD, QRIS National Learning Network (1) Apply BUILD, QRIS National Learning Network filter
- Education Development Center (EDC) (1) Apply Education Development Center (EDC) filter
- National Afterschool Association (NAA) (2) Apply National Afterschool Association (NAA) filter
- National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) (1) Apply National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) filter
- Office of Child Care (OCC) (8) Apply Office of Child Care (OCC) filter
- Other (15) Apply Other filter
- Urban Institute (1) Apply Urban Institute filter
Search Results
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filter By
CASEL's District Resource Center is developed in partnership with school districts that are part of the Collaborating Districts Initiative, which has recently been enhanced. This tool kit is also intended to provide resources to out-of-school programs.
This national study explores how low-income children's access to early childhood education might differ from their higher-income peers and how child care subsidy policies can close the gap. The study assigned states to one of five profiles based on a package of subsidy policies to produce findings about which packages provide equity in access to high quality programs.