NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- (-) Remove Family and Community Engagement filter Family and Community Engagement
- Professional Development (3) Apply Professional Development filter
- Program Design and Management (1) Apply Program Design and Management filter
- Quality Improvement (1) Apply Quality Improvement filter
- Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access (1) Apply Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access filter
- Supportive Learning Environment (3) Apply Supportive Learning Environment filter
- Systems Building (1) Apply Systems Building filter
Resource type
Publisher
- (-) Remove American Institutes for Research (AIR) filter American Institutes for Research (AIR)
- (-) Remove Child Trends filter Child Trends
- Administration for Children & Families (ACF) (1) Apply Administration for Children & Families (ACF) filter
- Afterschool Alliance (2) Apply Afterschool Alliance filter
- Collaborative for Acadmic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) (1) Apply Collaborative for Acadmic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) filter
- Education Development Center (EDC) (1) Apply Education Development Center (EDC) filter
- Kids Included Together (KIT) (1) Apply Kids Included Together (KIT) filter
- National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) (1) Apply National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) filter
- Office of Child Care (OCC) (3) Apply Office of Child Care (OCC) filter
- Other (11) Apply Other filter
- The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation (1) Apply The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation filter
Search Results
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filter By
This news report links to a lengthy report by AIR researchers that analyzed 10 years of data from the nation’s largest public school district and found that in-school or out-of-school suspensions did not reduce future misbehavior, nor result in improved academic achievement for peers, or perceptions of positive school climate.
This national study explores how low-income children's access to early childhood education might differ from their higher-income peers and how child care subsidy policies can close the gap. The study assigned states to one of five profiles based on a package of subsidy policies to produce findings about which packages provide equity in access to high quality programs.