NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- (-) Remove Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access filter Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (5) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Family and Community Engagement (1) Apply Family and Community Engagement filter
- Program Design and Management (2) Apply Program Design and Management filter
- Summer Learning (1) Apply Summer Learning filter
- Supportive Learning Environment (1) Apply Supportive Learning Environment filter
- Systems Building (3) Apply Systems Building filter
Resource type
Publisher
- (-) Remove Administration for Children & Families (ACF) filter Administration for Children & Families (ACF)
- (-) Remove Afterschool Alliance filter Afterschool Alliance
- (-) Remove The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation filter The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation
- Administration for Children & Families (ACF) (1) Apply Administration for Children & Families (ACF) filter
- American Institutes for Research (AIR) (1) Apply American Institutes for Research (AIR) filter
- Child Care Aware of America (1) Apply Child Care Aware of America filter
- Child Trends (2) Apply Child Trends filter
- National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) (1) Apply National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) filter
- Other (14) Apply Other filter
- Search Institute (1) Apply Search Institute filter
- The Wallace Foundation (9) Apply The Wallace Foundation filter
- Urban Institute (1) Apply Urban Institute filter
Search Results
Filter By
This report examines data from 31,000 households about their children's experiences in STEM learning in afterschool. Findings indicate that compared to 2014 data, in 2020 more afterschool programs are offering STEM, but gender and income inequities exist.
This report summarizes survey data collected in 2020, both before and during the pandemic; it is the fourth survey, preceded by findings from 2004, 2009, 2014.
This resource provides a review of tools that programs can use to measure youth outcomes. The outcomes selected include communication, relationships and collaboration, critical thinking and decision-making, initiative, and self-direction. The review includes cost and evidence of reliability and validity.
This executive summary reports on a three-year study of Youth Program Quality Improvement in 87 sites in four states that included quality assessment, improvement plans, coaching by managers, and staff training. The approach led to higher quality instructions across programs even where there was manager turnover, low staff education, and varying adult-youth ratios.