NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- (-) Remove Quality Improvement filter Quality Improvement
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (2) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Family and Community Engagement (1) Apply Family and Community Engagement filter
- Professional Development (1) Apply Professional Development filter
- School & Community Partnerships (1) Apply School & Community Partnerships filter
- Systems Building (3) Apply Systems Building filter
Resource type
Publisher
- (-) Remove Child Trends filter Child Trends
- (-) Remove RETIRED -- The After-School Corporation (TASC) filter RETIRED -- The After-School Corporation (TASC)
- Administration for Children & Families (ACF) (1) Apply Administration for Children & Families (ACF) filter
- Afterschool Alliance (2) Apply Afterschool Alliance filter
- American Institutes for Research (AIR) (1) Apply American Institutes for Research (AIR) filter
- Child Care Aware of America (1) Apply Child Care Aware of America filter
- National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) (1) Apply National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) filter
- Other (14) Apply Other filter
- Search Institute (1) Apply Search Institute filter
- The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation (2) Apply The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation filter
- The Wallace Foundation (9) Apply The Wallace Foundation filter
- Urban Institute (1) Apply Urban Institute filter
Search Results
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filter By
State Priorities for Child Care and Development Block Grant Funding Increase: 2019 National Overview
This report summarizes findings of a Child Trends survey to learn how states are using the additional federal funds to expand services for eligible children and implement CCDBG Reauthorization requirements.
This national study explores how low-income children's access to early childhood education might differ from their higher-income peers and how child care subsidy policies can close the gap. The study assigned states to one of five profiles based on a package of subsidy policies to produce findings about which packages provide equity in access to high quality programs.