NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (22) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Family and Community Engagement (9) Apply Family and Community Engagement filter
- Health and Safety and Licensing (4) Apply Health and Safety and Licensing filter
- Professional Development (12) Apply Professional Development filter
- Program Design and Management (11) Apply Program Design and Management filter
- Quality Improvement (20) Apply Quality Improvement filter
- School & Community Partnerships (8) Apply School & Community Partnerships filter
- Summer Learning (8) Apply Summer Learning filter
- Systems Building (24) Apply Systems Building filter
Resource type
- (-) Remove Report filter Report
- Infographic (2) Apply Infographic filter
- Issue brief (41) Apply Issue brief filter
- Journal article (1) Apply Journal article filter
- Other (9) Apply Other filter
- Tool kit (23) Apply Tool kit filter
- Video/video series (3) Apply Video/video series filter
- Webinar (13) Apply Webinar filter
- Website (4) Apply Website filter
Publisher
- (-) Remove Other filter Other
- (-) Remove The Wallace Foundation filter The Wallace Foundation
- Administration for Children & Families (ACF) (1) Apply Administration for Children & Families (ACF) filter
- Afterschool Alliance (2) Apply Afterschool Alliance filter
- American Institutes for Research (AIR) (1) Apply American Institutes for Research (AIR) filter
- Child Trends (2) Apply Child Trends filter
- National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) (1) Apply National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) filter
- The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation (1) Apply The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation filter
Search Results
Filter By
This report includes 34 standards for social-emotional learning practices in school-age settings from the Weikart Center for Program Quality, the Forum for Youth Investment, and the Wallace Foundation. There are 6 domains of standards: (1) emotion management, (2) empathy, (3) teamwork, (4) responsibility, (5) initiative, and (6) problem solving, plus a section on curriculum features.
This report by Prenatal to Five Fiscal Strategies provides a detailed summary of the process and the findings from New Mexico's cost study and cost estimation model in their effort to inform subsidy rate setting. The report shares cost of quality across age ranges, including school-age, and levels of quality in QRIS.
This slide deck presents research on how parents, teachers, and Out-of-School Time (OST) providers perceive the value of OST in children’s social, emotional, and academic development.
This report is based on the scant literature and interviews with 28 experts to explore issues of equity in the subsidy system. It includes a chart about the process of getting a subsidy, concerns about policies, and potential strategies to build equity.
This brief presents one city’s efforts to engage huge numbers of children and youth in summer programming through the strategic use of extensive public-private partnerships. It offers to other cities a promising model for bringing together program leaders, schools and universities, city planners, philanthropists, businesses, and researchers to benefit children.
This newly updated and expanded report provides a framework for understanding social and emotional learning (SEL). It can be used as a reference to compare the content and evidence of effectiveness of 33 SEL programs for elementary-age and preschool-age children.
This report provides a synthesis of 76 high quality studies on the impact of COVID-19 on young children and early childhood education programs. The studies and accompanying evidence-based and equity-centered policy recommendations were created by 10 leading scholars and 10 leaders in policy and practice for early childhood.
For this report, the Chicago teen program, After School Matters, partnered with the American Institutes for Research (AIR) to conduct surveys to understand three key topics as they relate to the unique circumstances of summer 2020: (1) teen experiences, (2) instructor experiences, and (3) program quality.
This report provides an overview of different ways states can design contracts; it is based on a literature review and convening of 26 state administrators, researchers, and advocates. Contracts can bring stability that the field needs and provide more equitable supports around access, salaries, benefits, and professional development.
This report shares evaluation findings from 2017 of the longer-term impacts of a summer learning project in five school districts: Boston, Dallas, Duval County in Florida, Pittsburgh, and Rochester. It explores the effects of two consecutive summers of voluntary, full-day programming for at least 20 days three school years after the second summer of programming.