NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- (-) Remove Professional Development filter Professional Development
- (-) Remove Program Design and Management filter Program Design and Management
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (1) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Supportive Learning Environment (1) Apply Supportive Learning Environment filter
Resource type
Publisher
- (-) Remove National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) filter National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST)
- Administration for Children & Families (ACF) (6) Apply Administration for Children & Families (ACF) filter
- Afterschool Matters Journal (2) Apply Afterschool Matters Journal filter
- American Institutes for Research (AIR) (2) Apply American Institutes for Research (AIR) filter
- Collaborative for Acadmic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) (3) Apply Collaborative for Acadmic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) filter
- Kids Included Together (KIT) (1) Apply Kids Included Together (KIT) filter
- National Afterschool Association (NAA) (3) Apply National Afterschool Association (NAA) filter
- Office of Child Care (OCC) (5) Apply Office of Child Care (OCC) filter
- Other (27) Apply Other filter
- The Wallace Foundation (3) Apply The Wallace Foundation filter
- US Department of Education (1) Apply US Department of Education filter
Search Results
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filter By
Coaching is one of the most effective ways to support staff and to improve program quality. With its focus on relationships, strengths-based practices, communication, and coaching strategies like reflective practice and building leadership capacity, this guide could be very helpful for leaders of programs in any stage of development.
Through a survey, this research study explored what Out-of-School Time (OST) program staff need in order to feel better prepared to support the inclusion of school-aged children with special needs in their programs. Results indicated that professional development on inclusion is key to success. These findings can inform policy and programmatic decisions on professional development.