NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- (-) Remove Professional Development filter Professional Development
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (8) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Family and Community Engagement (3) Apply Family and Community Engagement filter
- Program Design and Management (5) Apply Program Design and Management filter
- Quality Improvement (8) Apply Quality Improvement filter
- School & Community Partnerships (7) Apply School & Community Partnerships filter
- Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access (3) Apply Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access filter
- Supportive Learning Environment (9) Apply Supportive Learning Environment filter
- Systems Building (7) Apply Systems Building filter
Resource type
Publisher
- (-) Remove The Wallace Foundation filter The Wallace Foundation
- Administration for Children & Families (ACF) (4) Apply Administration for Children & Families (ACF) filter
- Afterschool Alliance (3) Apply Afterschool Alliance filter
- American Camp Association (1) Apply American Camp Association filter
- American Institutes for Research (AIR) (2) Apply American Institutes for Research (AIR) filter
- Aspen Institute (1) Apply Aspen Institute filter
- Child Trends (1) Apply Child Trends filter
- Education Development Center (EDC) (1) Apply Education Development Center (EDC) filter
- National Afterschool Association (NAA) (3) Apply National Afterschool Association (NAA) filter
- National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) (2) Apply National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) filter
- Office of Child Care (OCC) (10) Apply Office of Child Care (OCC) filter
- Opportunities Exchange (1) Apply Opportunities Exchange filter
- Other (17) Apply Other filter
Search Results
Filter By
The State of California has allocated an unprecedented sum of $4.6 billion in one-time relief and $3.4 billion in permanent funding to expand afterschool and summer learning opportunities.
This report chronicles the efforts of four cities—Boston, Dallas, Pittsburgh, and Washington, DC—to expand summer program opportunities for low-income students.
This slide show provides a summary of what parents, teachers, and Out-of-School Time (OST) providers want in summer programs for 2021 based on a combination of focus groups, interviews, and 3,031 surveys. Results indicate that parents want summer programs to prioritize their children’s social and emotional health.
This classic online calculator lets you determine the costs of a variety of high quality afterschool programs and the summer portions of year-round programs. The cost estimates were updated in 2021 to reflect changes in general cost of living and the relative cost of living across cities.
These five podcasts feature promising practices from the Partnerships for Social and Emotional Learning Initiative (PSELI). The episodes focus on developing the capacity of adults to promote SEL, building effective partnerships, the role of coaches, and coordination between school and out-of-school programs. This resource supports the COVID-19 response.
This report shares evaluation findings from 2017 of the longer-term impacts of a summer learning project in five school districts: Boston, Dallas, Duval County in Florida, Pittsburgh, and Rochester. It explores the effects of two consecutive summers of voluntary, full-day programming for at least 20 days three school years after the second summer of programming.
The report and executive summary review lessons learned from the first two years of the Partnership for Social-Emotional Learning Initiative (PSELI). Findings are based on surveys, interviews, and observations from 38 partnerships in 6 sites about the barriers and solutions to school-OST partnerships on SEL.
This report captures what was shared at an October 2019 Conference about the challenges of teaching social and emotional learning (SEL) in afterschool programs. It provides a brief history of the growing focus on SEL, along with a summary of remarks by national leaders.
This report offers information to aid summer learning leaders in securing and maintaining support for programs. It summarizes lessons learned from interviews with 60 school district staff and 20 policy experts on federal, state, city, and district funding and policies.