NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- (-) Remove Professional Development filter Professional Development
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (16) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Family and Community Engagement (7) Apply Family and Community Engagement filter
- Health and Safety and Licensing (5) Apply Health and Safety and Licensing filter
- Program Design and Management (6) Apply Program Design and Management filter
- School & Community Partnerships (3) Apply School & Community Partnerships filter
- Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access (4) Apply Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access filter
- Summer Learning (5) Apply Summer Learning filter
- Supportive Learning Environment (11) Apply Supportive Learning Environment filter
- Systems Building (16) Apply Systems Building filter
Resource type
Publisher
- (-) Remove National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) filter National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST)
- (-) Remove Other filter Other
- American Institutes for Research (AIR) (2) Apply American Institutes for Research (AIR) filter
- Aspen Institute (1) Apply Aspen Institute filter
- Child Trends (2) Apply Child Trends filter
- Search Institute (1) Apply Search Institute filter
- The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation (2) Apply The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation filter
- The Wallace Foundation (9) Apply The Wallace Foundation filter
Search Results
Filter By
This resource from the McCormick Center for Early Childhood Leadership and the L.E.A.D. Early Childhood Clearinghouse has data on qualifications for early childhood program leaders in state-by-state profiles, with a national overview. School-age leaders can learn what their state requires of leaders in licensing, credentials, and in QRIS.
This report includes 34 standards for social-emotional learning practices in school-age settings from the Weikart Center for Program Quality, the Forum for Youth Investment, and the Wallace Foundation. There are 6 domains of standards: (1) emotion management, (2) empathy, (3) teamwork, (4) responsibility, (5) initiative, and (6) problem solving, plus a section on curriculum features.
This report summarizes findings from focus groups and interviews from four states (WI, MA, CA, FL) about why family child care providers enter the field, stay in the work, or leave the field.
This report provides a synthesis of 76 high quality studies on the impact of COVID-19 on young children and early childhood education programs. The studies and accompanying evidence-based and equity-centered policy recommendations were created by 10 leading scholars and 10 leaders in policy and practice for early childhood.
For this report, the Chicago teen program, After School Matters, partnered with the American Institutes for Research (AIR) to conduct surveys to understand three key topics as they relate to the unique circumstances of summer 2020: (1) teen experiences, (2) instructor experiences, and (3) program quality.
This report provides an overview of different ways states can design contracts; it is based on a literature review and convening of 26 state administrators, researchers, and advocates. Contracts can bring stability that the field needs and provide more equitable supports around access, salaries, benefits, and professional development.
This report provides an overview of policies for Home-Based Child Care (HBCC). Child Trends scanned all 50 states and D.C. to explore HBCC policies on licensing, subsidy, QRIS, and funding. The goal of the report is to highlight states that might be good case studies for supportive policies for HBCC.
Based on interviews with 20 experts about strategies to support the child care workforce, this report presents a set of 19 diverse state and local policies strategies to build a stronger and more equitable workforce. It includes strategies in response to the pandemic crisis and ways to maximize impact through contracts, expanding family child care (FCC) networks, and shared services.
This quality outcomes study of a summer program in Seattle Public Schools provides evaluative evidence for an instructional model that showed positive change in academic performance and high quality instructional practices.
This report reviews rigorous large-scale evaluations and meta-analyses to understand the value and effectiveness of out-of-school programs through lenses of content, dosage, and outcomes. It includes recommendations for policy, practice, and funding based on the findings. It also has a separate appendix that summarizes results of primary and secondary outcomes from research.