NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (100) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Family and Community Engagement (41) Apply Family and Community Engagement filter
- Health and Safety and Licensing (16) Apply Health and Safety and Licensing filter
- Professional Development (63) Apply Professional Development filter
- Program Design and Management (51) Apply Program Design and Management filter
- Quality Improvement (68) Apply Quality Improvement filter
- School & Community Partnerships (42) Apply School & Community Partnerships filter
- Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access (42) Apply Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access filter
- Supportive Learning Environment (93) Apply Supportive Learning Environment filter
- Systems Building (96) Apply Systems Building filter
Resource type
Publisher
- Afterschool Alliance (3) Apply Afterschool Alliance filter
- American Institutes for Research (AIR) (1) Apply American Institutes for Research (AIR) filter
- National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) (7) Apply National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) filter
- Office of Child Care (OCC) (2) Apply Office of Child Care (OCC) filter
- Other (13) Apply Other filter
- The Wallace Foundation (5) Apply The Wallace Foundation filter
Search Results
Filter By
This issue brief summarizes how afterschool and summer programs can support positive outcomes like relationships and relationship skills, sense of agency, and identify development. It includes links to research.
This brief presents one city’s efforts to engage huge numbers of children and youth in summer programming through the strategic use of extensive public-private partnerships. It offers to other cities a promising model for bringing together program leaders, schools and universities, city planners, philanthropists, businesses, and researchers to benefit children.
This issue brief explores Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds (ESSER) and how these funds can support summer and afterschool programs. It reviews amount of ESSER funds for each state, what the funds can be used for, and how programs can access these funds through grants and contracts. It also includes examples of how CT, GA, NH, UT, and WV are using the funds.
For this report, the Chicago teen program, After School Matters, partnered with the American Institutes for Research (AIR) to conduct surveys to understand three key topics as they relate to the unique circumstances of summer 2020: (1) teen experiences, (2) instructor experiences, and (3) program quality.
The Wallace Foundation has created four issue briefs to help state system planners make decisions about spending American Rescue Plan funds. The briefs summarize the evidence on outcomes and implementation guidance and each brief includes a bibliography.
This updated research brief provides a summary of key evaluations on the impact of afterschool programs during the pandemic.
The 2020 edition of America After 3PM is designed to build a better understanding of how young people are spending their summers and to dig deeper into the types of summer experiences children across America have. The data were collected about Summer 2019 from a survey of nearly 30,000 households and 200 phone interviews.
This report shares evaluation findings from 2017 of the longer-term impacts of a summer learning project in five school districts: Boston, Dallas, Duval County in Florida, Pittsburgh, and Rochester. It explores the effects of two consecutive summers of voluntary, full-day programming for at least 20 days three school years after the second summer of programming.
This report from National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) examines data from focus groups and interviews conducted with 21 leaders representing 15 national award-winning summer learning programs in September 2020 and data from a survey of 1,047 afterschool and summer providers conducted in partnership with Afterschool Alliance in July and August 2020.
This report offers information to aid summer learning leaders in securing and maintaining support for programs. It summarizes lessons learned from interviews with 60 school district staff and 20 policy experts on federal, state, city, and district funding and policies.