NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (232) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Health and Safety and Licensing (53) Apply Health and Safety and Licensing filter
- Professional Development (148) Apply Professional Development filter
- Program Design and Management (120) Apply Program Design and Management filter
- Quality Improvement (135) Apply Quality Improvement filter
- Summer Learning (65) Apply Summer Learning filter
- Supportive Learning Environment (195) Apply Supportive Learning Environment filter
- Systems Building (175) Apply Systems Building filter
Resource type
- Infographic (2) Apply Infographic filter
- Issue brief (67) Apply Issue brief filter
- Journal article (2) Apply Journal article filter
- Other (22) Apply Other filter
- Report (35) Apply Report filter
- Tool kit (35) Apply Tool kit filter
- Video/video series (8) Apply Video/video series filter
- Webinar (35) Apply Webinar filter
- Website (11) Apply Website filter
Publisher
- Administration for Children & Families (ACF) (24) Apply Administration for Children & Families (ACF) filter
- Afterschool Alliance (10) Apply Afterschool Alliance filter
- Afterschool Matters Journal (1) Apply Afterschool Matters Journal filter
- American Institutes for Research (AIR) (5) Apply American Institutes for Research (AIR) filter
- Bipartisan Policy Center (2) Apply Bipartisan Policy Center filter
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (3) Apply Centers for Disease Control and Prevention filter
- Child Care Aware of America (2) Apply Child Care Aware of America filter
- Child Trends (6) Apply Child Trends filter
- Collaborative Communications (1) Apply Collaborative Communications filter
- Collaborative for Acadmic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) (1) Apply Collaborative for Acadmic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) filter
- Education Development Center (EDC) (2) Apply Education Development Center (EDC) filter
- Harvard Family Research Project (2) Apply Harvard Family Research Project filter
- Harvard University Center on the Developing Child (1) Apply Harvard University Center on the Developing Child filter
- National Afterschool Association (NAA) (3) Apply National Afterschool Association (NAA) filter
- National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) (1) Apply National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) filter
- National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) (7) Apply National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) filter
- Office of Child Care (OCC) (41) Apply Office of Child Care (OCC) filter
- Office of Head Start (1) Apply Office of Head Start filter
- Opportunities Exchange (2) Apply Opportunities Exchange filter
- Other (76) Apply Other filter
- RETIRED -- National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies (NACCRRA) (1) Apply RETIRED -- National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies (NACCRRA) filter
- Search Institute (2) Apply Search Institute filter
- The Wallace Foundation (16) Apply The Wallace Foundation filter
- Urban Institute (3) Apply Urban Institute filter
- US Department of Education (4) Apply US Department of Education filter
- US Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Education (2) Apply US Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Education filter
Search Results
Filter By
Given the growing momentum for a better approach to rate setting, Prenatal to Five Fiscal Strategies (P5FS) has developed this guide to using cost estimation modeling to set subsidy rates, informed by experience working with New Mexico and the District of Columbia as well as dozens of other states and communities in recent years.
First 10, a project of Education Development Center, focuses on coordinated, cross-sector efforts to improve teaching, learning, and care during the first decade of children’s lives.
This engaging webinar and panel explores what it will take to make Summer 2022 successful. Panelists shared out information on evidence-based practices like attendance, duration, site climate, and staffing. Program directors had tips on summer planning, designing a balanced program to support whole child needs, and partnerships with school and community.
This report by Prenatal to Five Fiscal Strategies provides a detailed summary of the process and the findings from New Mexico's cost study and cost estimation model in their effort to inform subsidy rate setting. The report shares cost of quality across age ranges, including school-age, and levels of quality in QRIS.
The unique needs and challenges for families needing Out-of-School Time (OST) child care are often unknown or overlooked. Their needs vary much more than they do for younger children due to the challenges created by balancing work schedules with school schedules.
The Urban Institute created this fact sheet to provide a summary of previous research on changing subsidy policies and procedures. It spells out seven ways states can make child care more accessible and equitable for families and more efficient for agencies. This resource supports equity.
This guide, by the Oregon Department of Education, offers an inspiring vision for summer learning in the post-pandemic world, prioritizing those most in need. It includes a focus on mental health and well-being and providing learning opportunities that can ignite and renew engagement, foster learning, and nourish in-person connections.
This guide, published by The Partnership for Children and Youth and the National Summer Learning Association is designed to support education leaders with summer planning. It includes foundational research, best practices, and sections on core values, laying the groundwork for success, research on quality, and road blocks to remove on funding and policies.
The National Center on Afterschool and Summer Enrichment (NCASE) has developed a number of resources focused on addressing equity in Out-of-School Time.
This blog points out that there is a clear need to invest in and expand early care and education programs that serve Native American children and families. Federal law often sets funding levels as a percentage of total authorization without determining funding based on tribal populations or needs that reflect disproportionately higher unemployment and poverty.