NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- (-) Remove Family and Community Engagement filter Family and Community Engagement
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (5) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Professional Development (2) Apply Professional Development filter
- Program Design and Management (2) Apply Program Design and Management filter
- Quality Improvement (7) Apply Quality Improvement filter
- School & Community Partnerships (6) Apply School & Community Partnerships filter
- Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access (3) Apply Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access filter
- Summer Learning (4) Apply Summer Learning filter
- Supportive Learning Environment (6) Apply Supportive Learning Environment filter
Resource type
Publisher
- (-) Remove The Wallace Foundation filter The Wallace Foundation
- Administration for Children & Families (ACF) (2) Apply Administration for Children & Families (ACF) filter
- Afterschool Alliance (1) Apply Afterschool Alliance filter
- American Institutes for Research (AIR) (1) Apply American Institutes for Research (AIR) filter
- American Youth Policy Forum (1) Apply American Youth Policy Forum filter
- Aspen Institute (1) Apply Aspen Institute filter
- Child Care Aware of America (1) Apply Child Care Aware of America filter
- Child Trends (4) Apply Child Trends filter
- Education Development Center (EDC) (1) Apply Education Development Center (EDC) filter
- Harvard Family Research Project (1) Apply Harvard Family Research Project filter
- National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) (1) Apply National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) filter
- National Women's Law Center (1) Apply National Women's Law Center filter
- Other (19) Apply Other filter
- Search Institute (1) Apply Search Institute filter
- The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation (2) Apply The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation filter
- Urban Institute (1) Apply Urban Institute filter
Search Results
Filter By
The State of California has allocated an unprecedented sum of $4.6 billion in one-time relief and $3.4 billion in permanent funding to expand afterschool and summer learning opportunities.
This report from the Rand Corporation provides lessons learned from the Wallace Foundation's Partnership for Social and Emotional Learning Initiative (PSELI). Since 2017, six cities each have 5-7 partnerships each to explore how children benefit if schools and out-of-school collaborate to improve climate and foster social-emotional learning.
This report chronicles the efforts of four cities—Boston, Dallas, Pittsburgh, and Washington, DC—to expand summer program opportunities for low-income students.
This slide deck presents research on how parents, teachers, and Out-of-School Time (OST) providers perceive the value of OST in children’s social, emotional, and academic development.
This report describes the state of afterschool coordination in a set of 75 large U.S. cities seven years after they were first surveyed in 2013. It focuses on three components: a designated coordinating entity, a common data system, and a framework or set of standards for program quality.
This report captures what was shared at an October 2019 Conference about the challenges of teaching social and emotional learning (SEL) in afterschool programs. It provides a brief history of the growing focus on SEL, along with a summary of remarks by national leaders.
This report is a summary from a national afterschool conference. It provides details from mayors, program providers, system leaders, and researchers on a range of system building issues including quality improvement and measurement of afterschool performance.
This guide describes how cities and intermediaries can work with afterschool providers across a neighborhood, city, or region to build quality. It explores how to identify a lead organization, engage stakeholders, use a continuous improvement model, and manage data systems. It includes case studies from Georgia, Texas, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, and Florida.
This report focuses on the four components of system building that the most current evidence and experience suggest are essential: strong leadership, coordination, effective use of data, and a comprehensive approach to quality.