NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- (-) Remove Family and Community Engagement filter Family and Community Engagement
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (6) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Professional Development (1) Apply Professional Development filter
- Program Design and Management (2) Apply Program Design and Management filter
- Quality Improvement (1) Apply Quality Improvement filter
- School & Community Partnerships (1) Apply School & Community Partnerships filter
- Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access (4) Apply Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access filter
- Systems Building (4) Apply Systems Building filter
Resource type
Publisher
- (-) Remove Afterschool Alliance filter Afterschool Alliance
- (-) Remove Child Trends filter Child Trends
- Administration for Children & Families (ACF) (1) Apply Administration for Children & Families (ACF) filter
- Education Development Center (EDC) (1) Apply Education Development Center (EDC) filter
- Harvard Family Research Project (1) Apply Harvard Family Research Project filter
- National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) (1) Apply National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) filter
- Other (10) Apply Other filter
- Search Institute (1) Apply Search Institute filter
- The Wallace Foundation (6) Apply The Wallace Foundation filter
Search Results
Filter By
The 2020 edition of America After 3PM is designed to build a better understanding of how young people are spending their summers and to dig deeper into the types of summer experiences children across America have. The data were collected about Summer 2019 from a survey of nearly 30,000 households and 200 phone interviews.
This report summarizes survey data collected in 2020, both before and during the pandemic; it is the fourth survey, preceded by findings from 2004, 2009, 2014.
This national study explores how low-income children's access to early childhood education might differ from their higher-income peers and how child care subsidy policies can close the gap. The study assigned states to one of five profiles based on a package of subsidy policies to produce findings about which packages provide equity in access to high quality programs.