NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- (-) Remove Family and Community Engagement filter Family and Community Engagement
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (7) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Professional Development (3) Apply Professional Development filter
- Program Design and Management (3) Apply Program Design and Management filter
- Quality Improvement (9) Apply Quality Improvement filter
- School & Community Partnerships (5) Apply School & Community Partnerships filter
- Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access (5) Apply Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access filter
- Summer Learning (3) Apply Summer Learning filter
- Supportive Learning Environment (5) Apply Supportive Learning Environment filter
- Systems Building (10) Apply Systems Building filter
Resource type
Publisher
- (-) Remove Child Trends filter Child Trends
- (-) Remove Collaborative for Acadmic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) filter Collaborative for Acadmic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL)
- (-) Remove Office of Head Start filter Office of Head Start
- (-) Remove The Wallace Foundation filter The Wallace Foundation
- Administration for Children & Families (ACF) (1) Apply Administration for Children & Families (ACF) filter
- Afterschool Alliance (1) Apply Afterschool Alliance filter
- Harvard Family Research Project (1) Apply Harvard Family Research Project filter
- National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) (1) Apply National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) filter
- Other (8) Apply Other filter
Search Results
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filter By
This report captures what was shared at an October 2019 Conference about the challenges of teaching social and emotional learning (SEL) in afterschool programs. It provides a brief history of the growing focus on SEL, along with a summary of remarks by national leaders.
This national study explores how low-income children's access to early childhood education might differ from their higher-income peers and how child care subsidy policies can close the gap. The study assigned states to one of five profiles based on a package of subsidy policies to produce findings about which packages provide equity in access to high quality programs.