NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- (-) Remove Professional Development filter Professional Development
- (-) Remove Quality Improvement filter Quality Improvement
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (3) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Family and Community Engagement (2) Apply Family and Community Engagement filter
- School & Community Partnerships (2) Apply School & Community Partnerships filter
- Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access (2) Apply Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access filter
- Systems Building (3) Apply Systems Building filter
Resource type
Publisher
- (-) Remove Child Trends filter Child Trends
- (-) Remove Harvard Family Research Project filter Harvard Family Research Project
- American Institutes for Research (AIR) (2) Apply American Institutes for Research (AIR) filter
- Aspen Institute (1) Apply Aspen Institute filter
- Child Care Aware of America (1) Apply Child Care Aware of America filter
- National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) (1) Apply National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) filter
- Other (15) Apply Other filter
- Search Institute (1) Apply Search Institute filter
- The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation (2) Apply The Forum for Youth Investment, The Wallace Foundation filter
- The Wallace Foundation (9) Apply The Wallace Foundation filter
Search Results
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filter By
Mary Pauper: A Historical Explanation of Early Care and Education Compensation, Policy, and Solution
The intent of this report by Child Trends is to build understanding of equity issues that have impacted early childhood education from a historical perspective between 1400 and the present day. It answers the question: How can racial equity be centered in policy and advocacy to support compensation, preparation, and standards?
This national study explores how low-income children's access to early childhood education might differ from their higher-income peers and how child care subsidy policies can close the gap. The study assigned states to one of five profiles based on a package of subsidy policies to produce findings about which packages provide equity in access to high quality programs.