NCASE Resource Library
Reset Selections
Topics
- Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion (23) Apply Culturally Responsive Practice & Inclusion filter
- Family and Community Engagement (13) Apply Family and Community Engagement filter
- Health and Safety and Licensing (1) Apply Health and Safety and Licensing filter
- Professional Development (11) Apply Professional Development filter
- Program Design and Management (18) Apply Program Design and Management filter
- Quality Improvement (18) Apply Quality Improvement filter
- School & Community Partnerships (14) Apply School & Community Partnerships filter
- Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access (5) Apply Subsidy, Eligibility, and Equal Access filter
- Supportive Learning Environment (27) Apply Supportive Learning Environment filter
- Systems Building (18) Apply Systems Building filter
Resource type
Publisher
- (-) Remove Afterschool Alliance filter Afterschool Alliance
- (-) Remove The Wallace Foundation filter The Wallace Foundation
- American Institutes for Research (AIR) (1) Apply American Institutes for Research (AIR) filter
- National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) (2) Apply National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST) filter
- National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) (17) Apply National Summer Learning Association (NSLA) filter
- Office of Child Care (OCC) (11) Apply Office of Child Care (OCC) filter
- Other (22) Apply Other filter
Search Results
Filter By
This webinar provides an overview of opportunities provided by the federal education funding from the American Rescue Plan, to help children re-engage, re-connect, and recover. The overview describes how much funding is available, how much has been distributed to state departments of education, and what evidence-based interventions are allowed.
The Wallace Foundation has created four issue briefs to help state system planners make decisions about spending American Rescue Plan funds. The briefs summarize the evidence on outcomes and implementation guidance and each brief includes a bibliography.
This updated research brief provides a summary of key evaluations on the impact of afterschool programs during the pandemic.
This slide show provides a summary of what parents, teachers, and Out-of-School Time (OST) providers want in summer programs for 2021 based on a combination of focus groups, interviews, and 3,031 surveys. Results indicate that parents want summer programs to prioritize their children’s social and emotional health.
The 2020 edition of America After 3PM is designed to build a better understanding of how young people are spending their summers and to dig deeper into the types of summer experiences children across America have. The data were collected about Summer 2019 from a survey of nearly 30,000 households and 200 phone interviews.
This classic online calculator lets you determine the costs of a variety of high quality afterschool programs and the summer portions of year-round programs. The cost estimates were updated in 2021 to reflect changes in general cost of living and the relative cost of living across cities.
During the pandemic, local community providers pioneered Community Learning Hubs to open their doors to support students that are in hybrid or all virtual schooling. The Afterschool Alliance has created this tool kit based on interviews with 32 programs, intermediaries and schools.
This report shares evaluation findings from 2017 of the longer-term impacts of a summer learning project in five school districts: Boston, Dallas, Duval County in Florida, Pittsburgh, and Rochester. It explores the effects of two consecutive summers of voluntary, full-day programming for at least 20 days three school years after the second summer of programming.
The Afterschool Alliance's webpage on COVID-19 offers a rich array of resources to help support Out-of-School Time (OST) system builders, administrators, and practitioners in navigating the challenges of the pandemic as they strive to effectively serve children, families, and providers.
This report offers information to aid summer learning leaders in securing and maintaining support for programs. It summarizes lessons learned from interviews with 60 school district staff and 20 policy experts on federal, state, city, and district funding and policies.